Download Action and Responsibility by Michael Bradie PDF

By Michael Bradie

E-book through Bradie, Michael

Show description

Read Online or Download Action and Responsibility PDF

Similar philosophy books

Kant, Foucault, and Forms of Experience

This research provides the theoretical gear of Foucault's early historic analyses as a model of Kantian feedback. In an preliminary textual exposition, the writer makes an attempt to distill a unified discursive perform from Kant's theoretical writings, arguing for Foucault's proximity to Kant at the foundation of this reconstruction, by way of exhibiting that his reports are modeled in this frame of mind.

A Companion to Kant (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy)

This significant other offers an authoritative survey of the total variety of Kant’s paintings, giving readers an concept of its gigantic scope, its awesome fulfillment, and its carrying on with skill to generate philosophical curiosity. * Written via a world solid of students* Covers all of the significant works of the severe philosophy, in addition to the pre-critical works* matters coated diversity from arithmetic and philosophy of technology, via epistemology and metaphysics, to ethical and political philosophy

The Image in French Philosophy (Consciousness, Literature and the Arts, Volume 5)

'The photograph in French Philosophy' demanding situations dominant interpretations of Bergson, Sartre, Lyotard, Baudrillard and Deleuze by way of arguing that their philosophy was once now not a critique yet a 'revival' of metaphysics as a pondering concerning impersonal forces and special by means of an aversion to subjectivity and an aversion of the philosophical gaze clear of the discourse of imaginative and prescient, and therefore clear of the picture.

Extra resources for Action and Responsibility

Example text

Cit. ' l. Professor Kim says that it is a philosophical platitude to think that there is no sharp distinction between empirical psychological issues and conceptual philosophical ones. He is surely right that there is no sharp distinction: I only wish that more of my co-workers in philosophy and psychology would agree that this claim is obviously true. In general, I think that there is no clear-cut and useful division of labor. Rather, there is a continuum, with philosophers being more concerned and better trained to deal with conceptual issues and psychologists being more concerned and better trained to construct empirical theories.

An obvious difference between Hull's nation of drive and rnaving to act is that the former is a property of the organism's physical state whereas the latter is a propert y of the organism's mental state. A necessary condition for drive is a physical need or deprivation; but it is not a necessary condition for an agent's intending to do something. Of course, need or deprivation may move a person to act; such a physical state may be the source of intending to do something. But not necessarily so.

What could be more obvious? But of course it isn't as obvious as it might seem, and that is why Brand's argument is a significant argument, and his claim (2) is a nontrivial thesis. And the apparent obviousness of the argument makes it imperative that the argument be refuted if it is in fact unsound. For the sake of brevity, I willstate my own reactions to Brand's argument in a bald way. The philosophical theory of action is an analysis of the ordinary concept of action; it may introduce refinements, remove minor points of incoherence, and bring to light hitherto unnoticed but important aspects of our notion of action; nonetheless the analysis is directed upon 26 STUDIES IN APPLIED PHILOSOPHY our ordinary, common-sense, workaday nation, or nations, of action.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.59 of 5 – based on 45 votes